← Back to Blog NARCISSISTIC ABUSE

DARVO in the Courtroom: Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender

DARVO—Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender—is one of the most effective manipulation tactics used by abusers in custody litigation. Understanding this pattern is essential for attorneys and families fighting psychological abuse.

What is DARVO?

DARVO is a reaction abusers employ when confronted with their behavior. Rather than acknowledging wrongdoing, they systematically deny the abuse occurred, attack the credibility of the person making accusations, and position themselves as the real victim. This reversal is so effective that evaluators and judges often believe the abuser over the actual victim.

• Deny: "That never happened. You're imagining things. You're remembering wrong."
• Attack: "You're mentally unstable. You're lying to get revenge. You're alienating the children."
• Reverse: "I'm the one being abused. I'm the victim of false allegations. I'm just trying to protect our children from you."

Why DARVO Works in Family Court

Family court evaluators and judges typically see only brief snapshots of behavior in controlled settings. DARVO exploits this limitation by presenting a compelling alternative narrative that appears more credible than the messy, emotional reality of abuse.

• Abusers remain calm while describing victim's "instability"
• Victims display trauma responses (anxiety, emotional reactivity) that seem to confirm abuser's claims
• No physical evidence of psychological abuse
• Evaluators lack training in recognizing manipulation patterns
• The reversal creates "he said, she said" where charm wins

How Forensic Experts Expose DARVO

Trained forensic psychologists recognize DARVO through pattern analysis, assessment of personality traits, and examination of communication records that reveal the truth behind the performance.

• Comprehensive personality assessment revealing narcissistic or antisocial traits
• Analysis of text/email communications showing control and gaslighting
• Pattern recognition across multiple incidents
• Assessment of trauma responses in victims consistent with prolonged abuse
• Collateral information contradicting abuser's narrative
• Identification of projection and blame-shifting patterns